pv source circuit wire sizing - Mike Holt's Forum

23 Jun.,2025

 

pv source circuit wire sizing - Mike Holt's Forum

Well i always thought I understood PV wire sizing, but as y'all know it gets a bit complex.
I am combining two PV strings on roof. Each string is 10.5 A Isc each = 21 A Isc combined.
There are existing #10 THHN conductors in conduit from roof to inverter. I would like to use those for labor saving.
Can I?

Overall, I would do the calcs like so:
De-rate wire ampacity down and multiply current up, then compare. Current must be less than equal to ampacity.

Specifically,
A. AMPACITY
Start with 40A ampacity to derate #10 THHN wire.
2 de-rates to consider:
-- Only 2 CCC in conduit, so no derate for # of wires in raceway.
-- Ambient TEMP: Average high Temps are just about 70-80F here, so no derate. (I recall it is average high temps that are to be used. Am i right on this? or record high Temp must be applied? Big difference!)

===> 40A x 1.0 x 1.0 = 40 A allowable ampacity (although ultimately 30A max allowed by NEC in end no matter what)

Now....can I further de-rate the 40A ampacity by 0.8 PV use factor - rather than multiply the Isc and continuous use factor by 1.25?
That gives me 32A allowable. This of course gets knocked to 30A absolute max allowable.

B. CURRENT
I multiply 21 A Isc by 1.25 continuous use factor = 26.25 A.
This is under the above 30A, so I am golden.

Otherwise if I must multiply by 1.56 (1.25 continuous and 1.25 PV use factors), then 1.25 x 1.25 x 21 A pushes me over 30A by a smidge. (1.56 x 21 A = 32.81 A) Ok.... by 2.81 smidges.

My recent reading says the 1.56 had been implied by the NEC, but not quite that simple..... and has been since clarified.
In other words, there is something about applying the 1.25 factors separately one at a time, but I never quite got that.
Any insight appreciated gents!
-- Ambient TEMP: Average high Temps are just about 70-80F here, so no derate. (I recall it is average high temps that are to be used. Am i right on this? or record high Temp must be applied? Big difference!)
There is an informational note to use ASHRAE as a data source for this. It isn't the record high, it is a statistical measure of a typical high, such that only 2% of the time will exceed it. You can get the data for high and low temperatures from solarabcs.com.

There also is a square root formula in the same section of the NEC, that occasionally has an advantage in its results when compared to using the table for looking up temperature correction factors. You can either use the table, or the square root formula, whichever is convenient for you.

Now....can I further de-rate the 40A ampacity by 0.8 PV use factor - rather than multiply the Isc and continuous use factor by 1.25?
The 0.8 is just an algebraic manipulation of the 1.25 multiplication that the NEC specifies. There are multiple 1.25 factors that may apply, and they can compound, depending on which calculation you are doing.

Derate factors are generally less than 1, so they generally reduce the ampacity of a conductor. Derates apply to wires, but not to terminations, which is the primary reason why there is value in 90C wire despite 75C terminations. It gives you headroom for your derate calculations. I know the NEC no longer uses the term derate, but it is the easiest way to explain it.

There is a 4-step calculation to determine the required ampacity of a conductor for "wild PV". I.e. PV circuits directly from the panels, or combined strings of panels, with no power electronics in between.
1. Calculate 1.56*Isc. Size your OCPD and terminations (generally 75C) from this value. An informational note tells you 1.25*1.25 becomes 1.56.

The reason for the two 1.25 factors:
The enhancement factor for more than 1kW/m^2 of sunlight. This applies for "wild PV", but not for outputs of current-limited devices.
The continuous load factor, this applies to sizing terminations and OCPDs, but does not apply to step 2 below.

2. Calculate 1.25*Isc/total derate. Look in the 90C column for a size that meets or exceeds this value.

3. Calculate the derated wire ampacity. 90C column value * total derate. This must "round up" to the OCPD you are using, if you are using one. If not, this step doesn't apply. See 240.4(B) for specifics of what I mean by "round up".

4. Confirm that the termination ampacity (usually 75C) also "rounds up" to the OCPD you are using.

It is the norm of ratings that terminations are 75C and wires are 90C, so adjust the above accordingly as applies to you. It is rare for today's wire types to be rated less than 90C. You may see 90C terminations, but they are a lot less common, and you have a burden of proof to confirm 90C terminations on both sides. 110.14(C) spells out the default termination ratings. The 60C part of the rule is more academic than practical, because most equipment is listed for the 75C rating. You still have a burden of proof, but it is rare to not meet it, for the 75C rating at 100A and less.

Remember, if part of equipment, the entire product needs to be listed for 90C terminations to take credit for it, and not just lugs marked AL9CU. To answer the question about MC4 connectors, as stand-alone connectors, they are 90C rated, but if built-in to a product, you have to follow the instructions of that manufacturer to know whether to use the 90C or 75C rating.
Do you have a reference for the idea that the continuous load factor applies to terminations? I don't see that in 110.14. Principally relevant for PV source conductors that have no OCPD.

Also, do you see a physics justification in applying a continuous load factor for the minimum ampacity of PV source conductors without OCPD? I don't. I only see the continuous load factor as coming from OCPD limitations. Ampacity is already a continuous rating.


So do PV panels typically come with +/- pigtails with MC4 connectors on them, and if so what temperature rating applies to those pigtails?

Cheers, Wayne

Read 690.8 and 690.9, that are the PV-specific sections. Part 1 and part 2 of my 4-step process, come directly from these sections.

As for the factory-installed MC4 connectors on PV panels, they usually are rated for 90C, but rarely (if ever) does this govern a design. Obviously, they have to have an ampacity rating for the product they are attached to, and unless you shine 2 suns of irradiance on them, you aren't going to overload those connectors from the ampacity.

Where you terminate your field-installed home runs on the other side of the wire, is more likely going to be what governs you to use the 75C rating.
I overlooked the exception to 690.8(B)(1), which has been in the NEC since at least the NEC. It reads:

Exception: Circuits containing an assembly, together with its overcurrent device(s), that is listed for continuous operation at 100 percent of its rating shall be permitted to be used at 100 percent of its rating.

I assume the DC inputs on a string inverter are rated for continuous operation at 100% of their rating? If so, this exception eliminates the need for the 125% continuous factor on ampacity for PV Source Circuits without OCPD.

I am of course reading "together with its overcurrent devices(s)" as meaning "overcurrent device(s) if any," rather than indicating that there must be an OCPD. Because that is the logical requirement.

Cheers, Wayne

One place you would see this, is if you are using a SolarBOS recombiner for a central inverter, that has continuous duty rated breakers in it, and is listed as an assembly to allow you to take credit for this. I've only seen this where the OCPD's are breakers, and I haven't seen it where the OCPD's are fuses.

There is a burden of proof to see this in documentation, to allow you to forgo the 125% continuous load factor. If it isn't specified, you treat every fuse or breaker as a standard OCPD, and size the OCPD to 1.56*Isc for "wild PV", and also apply the continuous load factor to all other parts of the calculation where it applies. Likewise, if it isn't specified that terminations in equipment where OCPD doesn't apply aren't specifically rated for continuous duty, then you also apply the continuous load factor

Solar PV Cable Material: Silane XLPE - Angreen

Silane Cross-linked Polyethylene Solar Photovoltaic Compounds: Key Application Materials For Photovoltaic Cables

Solar photovoltaic compounds play a key role in solar energy systems, improving the service life and power gene ration efficiency of photovoltaic systems. With the continuous advancement of solar photovoltaic technology, silane cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) has become an indispensable part of photovoltaic cable materials. It not only improves the durability and overall performance of photovoltaic cables, but also maintains efficient power transmission in extreme environments. This article will detail the application of silane cross-linked polyethylene in photovoltaic cables and its contribution to renewable energy production.

If you want to learn more, please visit our website SUNUA.

What Are Solar Photovoltaic Compounds?

Solar photovoltaic compounds are special materials used to produce photovoltaic cells and other solar system components. These compounds improve the efficiency of photovoltaic cells in converting sunlight into electricity and ensure their stability during system operation. Especially for solar photovoltaic cables, silane cross-linked polyethylene is a commonly used insulation material that can provide excellent electrical properties under extreme conditions.

What is Silane Cross-linked Polyethylene?

‌Silane cross-linked polyethylene is a chemical cross-linking process of polyethylene. By introducing silane coupling agents into polyethylene, it increases the strength, anti-aging and other characteristics of polyethylene. This makes it an ideal choice for the manufacture of photovoltaic cables. The cables used in photovoltaic systems need to remain stable for a long time under high temperature, different humidity and ultraviolet radiation. The excellent performance of silane cross-linked polyethylene meets these requirements. After using XLPE, solar cables can maintain maximum stability during transmission, reducing the probability of problems in photovoltaic systems.

Advantages of Silane Cross-linked Polyethylene To Enhance Solar Photovoltaic Cables

Thermal stability: Silane cross-linked polyethylene can still maintain its excellent electrical insulation under high temperature conditions, ensuring that photovoltaic cables and photovoltaic systems can also work stably in hot climates.

Electrical insulation: The cross-linked polyethylene material has excellent electrical insulation properties, which can effectively prevent electrical failures and improve the safety and reliability of solar photovoltaic systems.

Moisture and chemical corrosion resistance: XLPE has strong resistance to moisture and chemicals, allowing solar photovoltaic cables to be used for a long time in complex outdoor environments without damage.

Durability and service life: Photovoltaic cables made of silane cross-linked polyethylene are more durable, reducing the frequency of replacement and reducing the maintenance cost of the system.

The Role of Photovoltaic Cable Materials in Solar Systems

The successful operation of solar systems is inseparable from high-quality photovoltaic cables, and these cables are enhanced by a series of solar photovoltaic compounds. In the production process of photovoltaic panels, the choice of materials is crucial. Silane cross-linked polyethylene not only improves the insulation performance of the cable, but also ensures that the cable can maintain low energy losses during the solar power generation process. Improved efficiency: By using advanced photovoltaic compounds such as silane cross-linked polyethylene, photovoltaic systems can convert more solar energy into electricity, thereby significantly improving the efficiency of the system.

Want more information on pv cable compounds? Feel free to contact us.

Enhanced reliability: In harsh outdoor environments such as high temperature, UV exposure, humidity, etc., silane cross-linked polyethylene can protect cables from damage and ensure the continuous delivery of electricity.

Cost-effectiveness: Although the initial cost of silane cross-linked polyethylene materials may be higher, its long life and reduced maintenance requirements make solar photovoltaic systems more cost-effective overall.

Comparison of Silane Cross-linked Polyethylene With other Photovoltaic Compounds

Compared with other photovoltaic cable materials, silane cross-linked polyethylene has the following significant advantages:

Higher heat resistance: Compared with other polymers, XLPE is not easy to degrade at high temperatures, which is crucial for the continuous and stable operation of photovoltaic systems in direct sunlight environments.

Excellent environmental resistance: XLPE's resistance to moisture, UV and chemicals makes it perform better in long-term outdoor use.

Long-term cost-effectiveness: Although the initial investment is slightly higher, the long-term system operating costs are significantly reduced because XLPE extends the service life of solar cables and reduces the need for replacement and maintenance.

Future Prospects of Silane Cross-linked Polyethylene in Photovoltaic Systems

As the demand for renewable energy continues to grow, materials such as silane cross-linked polyethylene will play an increasingly important role in improving the efficiency and durability of solar systems. The research and application of new materials are driving the continuous advancement of photovoltaic cable and battery technology. In the future, with the emergence of more innovative materials, the performance of photovoltaic systems will be further optimized, promoting the popularization and sustainable development of solar energy around the world.

Conclusion

As a high-quality solar photovoltaic compound, the application of silane cross-linked polyethylene in photovoltaic cables has greatly improved the efficiency and stability of solar systems. With the development of clean energy technology, XLPE will occupy an important position in future solar applications and provide a more solid technical foundation for the renewable energy field.

If you are looking for more details, kindly visit thermoplastic compounds.